How many people reading this would actually accept anything a person said about natural history if he claimed to be a geologist while spouting biblical references and declaring his absolute faith in the literal accuracy of the bible? Is there anyone here who would actually entertain the thought that he might really be representing a scientific view? Is biblical literalism still considered an "alternative" science by more than the fundies and ill-informed people who are impressed with their pseudoscience and techno-babble?
No comments:
Post a Comment